Claims guidance
Supplemental Claim, Higher-Level Review, or Board Appeal?
VA offers three main decision-review options. The useful starting question is whether you have new evidence, believe the existing record was evaluated incorrectly, or want a Veterans Law Judge to review the case.
Compare the three paths
| Review option | Main distinction |
|---|---|
| Supplemental Claim | New and relevant evidence |
| Higher-Level Review | Review of the existing record |
| Board Appeal | Veterans Law Judge review |
These are general distinctions, not a recommendation for your claim. Available options depend on the decision and procedural history. Read the review instructions included with the decision.
When there is additional evidence
A Supplemental Claim generally involves new and relevant evidence that VA did not previously consider. Identify the reason for the earlier denial, then consider whether the additional evidence addresses that reason. Simply resubmitting the same material may not resolve the issue.
When the existing record is the issue
Higher-Level Review asks a more senior reviewer to reconsider the decision using the evidence already of record. It is not the route for introducing new evidence. An optional informal conference can help identify claimed errors, but it is not a new evidence hearing.
Deadlines and effective dates
Many decisions have a one-year window for requesting review while preserving potential effective-date protections. Some types of decisions and contested claims have different deadlines. A Supplemental Claim may be filed later in some circumstances, but timing can affect the effective date.
Do not choose a path only because someone online says it is fastest. Bring the decision letter, evidence list, and your questions to an accredited representative before a deadline passes. This site does not submit reviews or represent claimants.
Official sources
Sources checked September 20, 2026. General education; no individual claim assessment. How we prepare and check content.